All Issue

2018 Vol.28, Issue 1

Research Article

Rock Permeability Estimation from Hydraulic Injection Tests in a Sealed Borehole Interval

Nghiep Q. Quach1
,
Yeonguk Jo12
,
Chandong Chang1*
1Korea Institute of Civil Engineering and Building Technology
1Now at Radioactive Waste Disposal Research Division, Korea Atomic Energy Research Institute
* 교신저자* Corresponding Author
March 2018. pp. 001-009
PDF XML Citation
Abstract

We propose a borehole test technique to estimate permeability of rocks in borehole. The borehole tests are hydraulic injection tests such as leak-off test and hydraulic fracturing tests, which are originally conducted for stress or casing integrity assessment and not for permeability measurement. We use one-dimensional radial diffusion equation to interpret fluid injection test results in terms of permeability. We apply this technique to a leak-off test conducted at a depth of 700 m in a wellbore, where rock formation is mudstone. The estimated permeability is at an order of 10-16 m2, which is somewhat high but within the range reported for mudstones previously. Quantitative rick assessment suggests that an accurate measurement of open hole section length is important to improve reliability of results. More data may be needed to ensure the reliability of this technique. If validated, however, this technique can provide cost-effective estimation of in situ permeability without conducting independent permeability tests in borehole.

Keywords
hydraulic injection test
permeability
diffusion equation
mudstone
References
1
Addis, M.A., Hanssen, T.H., Yassir, N., Willoughby, D.R., Enerver, J., 1998, A comparison of Leak-Off Test And Extended Leak-Off Test Data For Stress Estimation, the SPE/ISRM Eurock, 98, 131-140.
2
Alireza, A.M., Rick, C., 2015, Laboratory investigation of Shale permeability, the SPE/CSUR Unconventional Resources Conference in Calgary, Canada, 27p.
3
Aplin, A.C., Fleet, A. J., Macquaker, J.H.S., 1999, Muds and mudsrones: physical and fluid-flow properties, Geology Society London Special Publications, 158, 1-8.
10.1144/GSL.SP.1999.158.01.01
4
Bai, M., Elsworth, D., 2000, Coupled processes in subsurface deformation, flow, and transfort, American Society of Civil Engineers, 334p.
10.1061/9780784404607
5
Bethke, M.C., 1989, Modeling subsurface flow in sedimentary basins, Geologische Rundschau, 78(1), 129-154.
10.1007/BF01988357
6
Bjorlykke, K., 1993, Fluid flow in sedimentary basin, Sedimentary Geology, 86, 137-158.
7
Cappa, F., Rutqvist, J., 2011, Modeling of coupled deformation and permeability evolution during fault reactivation induced by deep underground injection of CO2, International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 5, 336-346.
8
Crolet, M.J., Hatri, E.M., 1998, Recent Advances in Problems of Flow and Transport in Porous Media, Springer Science & Business Media, 11, 244p.
10.9720/kseg.2014.4.455
9
Domenico, P.A., Schwartz, F.W., 1998, Physical and Chemical Hydrogeology, John Wiley & Sons, New York, 506p.
10
Gjønnes, M., Cruz, A.M.G.L., Horsrud, P., Holt, R.M., 1998, (Leak-off tests for horizontal stress determination?, Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 20, 63-71.
10.1016/S0920-4105(97)00053-3
11
Hamm, S., Kim, M., Cheong, J., Kim, J., Son, M., Kim, T., 2007, Relationship between hydraulic conductivity and fracture properties estimated from packer tests and borehole data in a fractured granite, Engineering Geology, 92, 73-87.
10.1016/j.enggeo.2007.03.010
12
Johnson, C.R., Greenkorn, R.A., Woods, E.G., 1966, Pulse-Testing: A New Method for Describing Reservoir Flow Properties Between Wells, Journal of Petroleum Technology, 18(12), 1599-1604.
10.2118/1517-PA
13
Knipe, R.J., Jones, G., Fisher, Q.J., 1998, Faulting, fault sealing and fluid flow in hydrocarbon reservoirs: an introduction. Geological Society London Special Publications, 147(1), vii-xxi.
10.1144/GSL.SP.1998.147.01.01
14
Kruseman, P.G., de Ridder, A.N., Verweij, M.J., 1994, Analysis and Evaluation of Pumping Test Data, International Institute for Land Reclamation and Improvement, The Netherlands, 377p.
15
Liang, J.Q., 2002, Application of Quantitative Risk Analysis to Pore Pressure and Fracture Gradient Prediction, the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Texas, SPE 77354, 1-9.
16
Lin, W., Yamamoto, K., Ito, H., Masago, H., Kawamura, Y., 2008, Estimation of minimum principal stress from an extended leak-off test onboard the Chikyu Drilling Vessel and suggestions for future test procedures, Scientific Drilling, 6, 43-47.
10.5194/sd-6-43-2008
17
Lohman, S.W., 1972, Ground-Water Hydraulics, Geological Survey Professional Paper 708, US Geological Survey, Washington, DC, 70p.
12
Luijendijk, E., Gleeson, T., 2014, How well can we predict permeability in sedimentary basins? Deriving and evaluating porosity-permeability equations for noncemented sand and clay mixtures, Geofluids, 15, 67-83.
10.1111/gfl.12115
19
Mollah, A.M., Sayed, S.A.S., 1995, Assessment of in situ permeability with emphasis on parker testing in Kuwait, Engineering Geology, 39, 217-231.
10.1016/0013-7952(95)00014-7
20
Moos, D., Peska, P., Finkbeiner, T., Zoback, M., 2003, Comprehensive wellbore stability analysis utilizing quantitative risk assessment, Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 38, 97-109.
10.1016/S0920-4105(03)00024-X
21
Neuzil, E.C., 1994, How permeable are clays and shales?, Water Resources Research, 30(2), 145-150.
10.1029/93WR02930
22
Oliver, D.S., 1992, Estimation of Radial Permeability Distribution from Well-Test Data, SPE Formation Evaluation, 7(4), 290-296.
10.2118/20555-PA
23
Pearson, R., Money, M.S., 1977, Improvements in the Lugeon or packer permeability test, Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology and Hydrogeology, 10, 221-239.
10.1144/GSL.QJEG.1977.010.03.05
24
Raaen, A.M., Horsrud, P., Kjørholt, H., Økland, D., 2006, Improved routine estimation of the minimum horizontal stress component from extended leak-off tests, International Journal of Rock Mechanics & Mining Sciences, 43, 37-48.
10.1016/j.ijrmms.2005.04.005
25
Rasmussen, T.C., Evans, D.D., Sheets, P.J., Blanford, J.H., 1993, Permeability of Apache Leap Tuff: Borehole and Core Measurements Using Water and Air, Water Resources Research, 29, 1997-2006.
10.1029/93WR00741
26
Selvadurai, A.P.S., Carnaffan, P., 1997, A transient pressure pulse method for the mesurement of permeability of a cement grout, Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, 24(3), 489-502.
10.1139/l96-132
27
Uehara, S., Takahashi, M., 2014, Evolution of permeability and microstructure of experimentally-created shear zones in Neogene siliceous mudstones from Horonobe, Japan, Journal of Structural Geology, 60, 46-54.
10.1016/j.jsg.2013.12.003
28
Wang, T.C., Yeh, D.H., 2008, Obtaining the steady-state drawdown solutions of constant-head and constant-flux tests, Hydrological Processes, 22, 3456-3461.
10.1002/hyp.6950
29
White, A.J., Traugott, W.O., Swarbrick, R.E., 2002, The use of leak-off tests as means of predicting minimum in-situ stress, Petroleum Geoscience, 8, 189-193.
10.1144/petgeo.8.2.189
30
Wu, Y.S., Pruess, K., 2000, Integral solutions for transient fluid flow through a porous medium with pressure-dependent permeability, International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 37(1), 51-61.
10.1016/S1365-1609(99)00091-X
31
Yang, Y., Aplin, A.C., 2007, Permeability and petrophysical properties of 30 natural mudstones, Journal of Geophysical Research, 112, 1-14.
10.1029/2005JB004243
32
Zoback, M.D., 2007, Reservoir Geomechanics, Cambridge University Press.
10.1017/CBO9780511586477
Information
  • Publisher :Korean Society of Engineering Geology
  • Publisher(Ko) :대한지질공학회
  • Journal Title :The Journal of Engineering Geology
  • Journal Title(Ko) :지질공학
  • Volume : 28
  • No :1
  • Pages :001-009
  • Received Date : 2017-12-29
  • Revised Date : 2018-02-20
  • Accepted Date : 2018-02-24
  • DOI :https://doi.org/10.9720/kseg.2018.1.001
Journal Informaiton The Journal of Engineering Geology The Journal of Engineering Geology
Online Submission
  • NRF
  • KOFST
  • KISTI Current Status
  • KISTI Cited-by
  • crosscheck
  • orcid
  • open access
  • ccl
Journal Informaiton Journal Informaiton - close